It is a good study but I am afraid you lost some exciting moments of your previous model here. Your previous study had a very unique feel of ground plane interaction as well as circulation. The ribbon as a connector / wrapper of larger areas created a very interesting spatial fluidity. Try to bring these back.
This study has two “faces” that do not converse pretty well yet. On one side the linear elements (sticks) and on the other the free form srf. Could you enhance their dialog?
Looking also this study next to the surroundings I would propose you work with it’s scale a bit more.
Try to answer: What is the driver of your form? How could the programmatic manifesto help you while shaping the form?
These are starting to look like FORM!! It is time to stuff them now.
ReplyDeleteIt is a good study but I am afraid you lost some exciting moments of your previous model here. Your previous study had a very unique feel of ground plane interaction as well as circulation. The ribbon as a connector / wrapper of larger areas created a very interesting spatial fluidity. Try to bring these back.
ReplyDeleteThis study has two “faces” that do not converse pretty well yet. On one side the linear elements (sticks) and on the other the free form srf. Could you enhance their dialog?
Looking also this study next to the surroundings I would propose you work with it’s scale a bit more.
Try to answer: What is the driver of your form? How could the programmatic manifesto help you while shaping the form?